The main reasons for outsourcing legal work, like any other type of outsourcing, are "cost-saving, convenience and efficiency." Those who utilize Indian attorneys also claim that they receive the cost benefits without a loss in quality because Indian attorneys are well educated as India has a common law system and all legal training and work in India is already performed in English. But despite these benefits, a number of considerations prevent firms and businesses from joining the outsourcing bandwagon. "Outsourcing of legal work" has its concerns in a number of unanswered ethics questions. One such question is - whether there is a valid argument that a U.S. law firm is now compelled, or even under a duty to at the very least inform their clients of the "offshore" option for document review?
An ethical obligation of a lawyer is to bill clients reasonably for the legal services performed. An unreasonable or excessive fee cannot be charged. In the context of outsourcing legal work, the ethics of reasonable billing the client by the lawyer for legal services has implications in another ethical obligation i.e. to reasonably consult with the client about the means by which the client's objectives are to be accomplished. In analyzing a lawyer's duty to obtain consent regarding the outsourcing arrangement, an analogy regarding the use of temporary or contract lawyers may be useful. Whether a lawyer would share client confidences and secrets, the amount of involvement of the contract lawyer and the significance of the work performed by the temporary attorney are some of the factors which become important for consideration in the circumstances. Participation by a lawyer whose work is limited to legal research or tangential matters may not press for client consent whereas if a temporary attorney makes strategic decisions or performs other work that the client would expect of the senior lawyers working on the client's matters then there should be disclosure of the nature of the work performed by the contract lawyer and obtain client consent.
Thus a plausible approach could be the extension of the above nuanced approach for temporary lawyers to foreign attorneys putting forth the argument that foreign attorneys often play a limited role in matters than contact or temporary lawyers do. Rather than reflexively informing a client every time that the lawyer intends to outsource legal support services overseas, a set of factors may be set out to apply when deciding when a lawyer needs to inform clients. These factors may include whether the lawyer plays a significant role in the matter, whether the lawyer will share client confidences or secrets, whether the client would except that only firm employees will manage their matter and whether the lawyer plans on billing foreign attorneys in a matter other than cost. [i]
Given some of the future predictions and also the current scenario of the potential of outsourcing legal work there may be a situation when a client expects a law firm to utilize foreign attorneys to cut costs, making disclosure unnecessary based on the extent of the foreign attorney's involvement, the sharing of client confidences and secrets, the reasonable expectations of the client and the method of billing the client.
[i] Woffinden Keith, Surfing the Next Wave of Outsourcing: The Ethics of Sending Domestic Legal Work to Foreign Countries under New York City Opinion 2006-3, Brigham Young University Law Review, 2007.
View Other Articles
Ascent in Legal Offshoring: An Overview
August 26, 2011
Advanced possibilities for retrieving Indian patent information
June 1, 2011
Dynamism in the Offshoring sector!
June 25, 2010
Extension of Offshoring services across domains
June 11, 2010
Possible impact of rising IP Awareness
June 4, 2010
Offshoring Transcription services to India: Been there, heard that, done that!
May 28, 2010
Steering client relations ahead to gain a Competitive edge
April 29, 2010
The possible need for an industry wide alliance in the Legal Offshoring Space
April 1, 2010
Determining the factors to maximize Profits
March 25, 2010
Ensuring the Escalation of Quality
March 19, 2010
Expansion in Legal Offshoring Delivery
February 4, 2010
Focus and strategy in Offshoring
January 29, 2010
Standing of the Legal Offshoring sector
December 18, 2009
Offshoring IP Audit services
December 11, 2009
Prominence of IP Information as a Tool
December 4, 2009
Measuring the features of different Pricing Models
November 27, 2009
Offshoring Research services in the Legal Arena
November 19, 2009
Handholding Innovation while Outsourcing
November 12, 2009
Choosing the Candidates for Outsourcing
November 5, 2009
Proposed Legislations to Enhance Data Protection
October 29, 2009
Protection of IP created while Offshoring
October 15, 2009
Standing out in a Competitive Scenario
October 9, 2009
Creation of a Technology Liaison in an Outsourcing Unit
October 1, 2009
Third Party Information and Confidentiality norms
September 24, 2009
Role of a Dispute Resolution Clause in an Offshoring Contract
September 17, 2009
Adopting a Viable Pricing Model to Maximize RoI
September 10, 2009
The Role of Integration for effective delivery
September 3, 2009
Aligning Vendor Scale to Client size and Expectation
August 27, 2009
Offshoring Legal Services: Preventing Unauthorized Practice of Law
August 20, 2009
The role of training in Outsourcing
August 13, 2009
Outsourcing and RFP: Striking a Fair Deal
August 6, 2009
Value Creation: a desired outcome of Outsourcing
July 30, 2009
Looking for returns through Outsourcing: A client perspective
July 23, 2009
The importance of Project Management in Outsourcing
July 16, 2009
Scalability of Operations in Outsourcing
July 8, 2009
Advantage Outsourcing: A trend to stay
July 3, 2009
Role of Clients in Escalating Quality
June 25, 2009
Combating the risk of confidentiality and data security loss
June 18, 2009
Offshoring is Reorganization of Work
June 11, 2009
Formulating Outsourcing Contract
June 3, 2009
Implications of ABA opinion on Legal Outsourcing
May 28, 2009
Outsourcing and Document Processing
May 14, 2009
Ethical Imperatives of Conflict Checking in an LPO
May 7, 2009
Managing offshore Risks
May 1, 2009
Captives May Not Always Be What They Seem
April 23, 2009
Spotting a Trend in Outsourcing
April 16, 2009
A Brief Note on Knowledge Outsourcing
April 9, 2009
Offshore Patent Services
April 2, 2009
Economic Crisis and Outsourcing Space
March 26, 2009
Client Consent in Outsourcing Context
March 19, 2009
Offshore the Law
March 5, 2009
Forecasting a Positive Outlook for LPO Sector
February 26, 2009
Changing Nuances of Outsourcing
February 19, 2009
Litigation Work Being Outsourced to India
February 12, 2009
Keyword-Linked Advertising and Trademark Infringement
January 30, 2009
Offshoring Through The Eyes Of In-House Counsels
January 16, 2009
Compensation Rules the Roost in LPO Boom
January 8, 2009
Effective Legal Outsourcing Through Captive Centers
December 17, 2008
Growth of LPO industry in Industry
December 6, 2008
Regulation of Legal Process Outsourcing Explored
November 27, 2008
Legal Sector Poised for Innovation
November 13, 2008
Third Party Patent Marketing: A New Avenue in Knowledge Process Outsourcing
October 23, 2008