The American Bar Association with an ethics opinion on legal outsourcing has literary blessed the outsourcing trend.
Legal outsourcing has in recent times become a salutary for the globalized economy. A growing number of legal process outsourcing (LPO) companies have come up to offer the services of lawyers abroad to handle the most labor-intensive aspects of legal matters, especially document review in large-scale litigation. India has been the most popular destination for legal outsourcing because it has a common-law system and English is widely spoken.
Companies operating in the outsourcing space hailed the advisory by the ABA's ethics committee as a major step forward for their nascent industry and that the advisory would help set industry standards for newcomers and also comfort potential clients still wary of outsourcing legal work. A prevailing though is that the ABA opinion on legal outsourcing lays out the framework for how to do this. Ethics Opinion 08-451, dated Aug. 5, states that sending legal work overseas is ethically permissible as long as the lawyer doing the outsourcing takes steps to ensure the protection of client confidences and preservation of attorney-client privilege. The advisory also states that attorneys should check to make sure that foreign lawyer are suitably trained and competent and that bills for outsourced work be reasonable.
The advisory noted that outsourcing "affords the lawyers the ability to reduce their costs and often the cost to the client to the extent that the individuals or entities providing outsourced services can do so at lower rates than the lawyers' own staff." The ABA also said outsourcing created new opportunities for smaller firms to handle larger matters.
But in the entire circumstances one question gains precedence that does it implicitly set a new, higher standard for lawyers who delegate work, irrespective of they delegate onshore or offshore?
EDD consultant and author Conrad Jacoby wrote ABA Outsourcing Opinion - What it means to You as a Litigation Support Professional in Litigation Support Today (Feb/Apr 09). He analyzes the American Bar Association formal opinion 08-451 regarding outsourcing legal and ancillary services. Jacoby writes - "ABA's opinion was driven by the need to clarify the role of third party document review services, the language of the opinion is much broader, serving as a yardstick to measure any outsourced service provided to a legal team..... the Opinion makes it clear that blaming performance issues entirely on a vendor is no longer a winning defense inside a litigation matter."
The opinion suggests specific due diligence steps for offshore work but the implicit standard it sets apply to any outsourcing, including domestic. Conrad Jacoby is of the opinion that the burden on law firms has shifted from demonstrating that they outsourced a project to demonstrating the reasonableness of their oversight of an outsourced project.
He presents good practical advice for legal assistants and litigation support professionals, especially concerning keeping records of their interactions with vendors. He also notes that the opinion makes "clear that a legal team that elects to outsource work still retains full responsibility for the quality of the work, just as if the work had been performed directly by members of the legal team."
Applying the duty of care implied by the opinion, the law firms seem to be subjected to the same tests to which they must subject vendors?
View Other Articles
Ascent in Legal Offshoring: An Overview
August 26, 2011
Advanced possibilities for retrieving Indian patent information
June 1, 2011
Dynamism in the Offshoring sector!
June 25, 2010
Extension of Offshoring services across domains
June 11, 2010
Possible impact of rising IP Awareness
June 4, 2010
Offshoring Transcription services to India: Been there, heard that, done that!
May 28, 2010
Steering client relations ahead to gain a Competitive edge
April 29, 2010
The possible need for an industry wide alliance in the Legal Offshoring Space
April 1, 2010
Determining the factors to maximize Profits
March 25, 2010
Ensuring the Escalation of Quality
March 19, 2010
Expansion in Legal Offshoring Delivery
February 4, 2010
Focus and strategy in Offshoring
January 29, 2010
Standing of the Legal Offshoring sector
December 18, 2009
Offshoring IP Audit services
December 11, 2009
Prominence of IP Information as a Tool
December 4, 2009
Measuring the features of different Pricing Models
November 27, 2009
Offshoring Research services in the Legal Arena
November 19, 2009
Handholding Innovation while Outsourcing
November 12, 2009
Choosing the Candidates for Outsourcing
November 5, 2009
Proposed Legislations to Enhance Data Protection
October 29, 2009
Protection of IP created while Offshoring
October 15, 2009
Standing out in a Competitive Scenario
October 9, 2009
Creation of a Technology Liaison in an Outsourcing Unit
October 1, 2009
Third Party Information and Confidentiality norms
September 24, 2009
Role of a Dispute Resolution Clause in an Offshoring Contract
September 17, 2009
Adopting a Viable Pricing Model to Maximize RoI
September 10, 2009
The Role of Integration for effective delivery
September 3, 2009
Aligning Vendor Scale to Client size and Expectation
August 27, 2009
Offshoring Legal Services: Preventing Unauthorized Practice of Law
August 20, 2009
The role of training in Outsourcing
August 13, 2009
Outsourcing and RFP: Striking a Fair Deal
August 6, 2009
Value Creation: a desired outcome of Outsourcing
July 30, 2009
Looking for returns through Outsourcing: A client perspective
July 23, 2009
The importance of Project Management in Outsourcing
July 16, 2009
Scalability of Operations in Outsourcing
July 8, 2009
Advantage Outsourcing: A trend to stay
July 3, 2009
Role of Clients in Escalating Quality
June 25, 2009
Combating the risk of confidentiality and data security loss
June 18, 2009
Offshoring is Reorganization of Work
June 11, 2009
Formulating Outsourcing Contract
June 3, 2009
Implications of ABA opinion on Legal Outsourcing
May 28, 2009
Outsourcing and Document Processing
May 14, 2009
Ethical Imperatives of Conflict Checking in an LPO
May 7, 2009
Managing offshore Risks
May 1, 2009
Captives May Not Always Be What They Seem
April 23, 2009
Spotting a Trend in Outsourcing
April 16, 2009
A Brief Note on Knowledge Outsourcing
April 9, 2009
Offshore Patent Services
April 2, 2009
Economic Crisis and Outsourcing Space
March 26, 2009
Client Consent in Outsourcing Context
March 19, 2009
Offshore the Law
March 5, 2009
Forecasting a Positive Outlook for LPO Sector
February 26, 2009
Changing Nuances of Outsourcing
February 19, 2009
Litigation Work Being Outsourced to India
February 12, 2009
Keyword-Linked Advertising and Trademark Infringement
January 30, 2009
Offshoring Through The Eyes Of In-House Counsels
January 16, 2009
Compensation Rules the Roost in LPO Boom
January 8, 2009
Effective Legal Outsourcing Through Captive Centers
December 17, 2008
Growth of LPO industry in Industry
December 6, 2008
Regulation of Legal Process Outsourcing Explored
November 27, 2008
Legal Sector Poised for Innovation
November 13, 2008
Third Party Patent Marketing: A New Avenue in Knowledge Process Outsourcing
October 23, 2008