Keyword-Linked Advertising and Trademark Infringement

January 30, 2009

Educomp Solutions is using AdWords, a Google advertising option on the Internet that allows users who spot these ads to click on a link that opens a page on the advertiser’s website. When people search on Google using one of the advertiser’s keywords, the ad may appear next to the search results.

According to a news report, the education solutions provider, Educomp’s resort to this innovative way of advertising is an attempt to ward off the consequences of malicious e-mails alleging account manipulation. The webpage on the website of Educomp Solutions contains clarifications addressing the allegations about the company that were circulated.

The major search engine companies Google, Yahoo! and MSN among them generate revenue from their sale of search terms as a way to generate advertising revenue. AdWords, Google's flagship advertising product and main source of revenue contributes about $16.4 billion (Rs 78,720 crore in 2007). AdWords offers pay-per-click (PPC) advertising, and site-targeted advertising for both text and banner ads. A customer may purchase one or more “keywords.” When an Internet user enters one or more of these keywords in a search engine, the search results screen, in addition to the list of the organic search results, shows “Sponsored Links” to the websites of the companies or persons who purchased the keywords. The hyperlinks are displayed in a separate column labeled “Sponsored Links” to the right of the search results (and sometimes at the top of the search results). The links are typically displayed with a short text advertisement for the “sponsor” or the sponsor's website.

Keyword purchasers may purchase keywords that are descriptive of their goods and services. Purchasers have, however, also purchased as keywords the trademarks of their competitors. The paid search term or keyword may or may not be used in the sponsor's advertising text.

As the use of search engines becomes more and more omnipresent in the business and personal lives of Internet users, the controversy surrounding use of trademarks in keyword advertising has increased while underscoring the tension between trademark owners and Internet search companies and the level of protection that should be accorded to trademark owners in the age of the Internet.

An expert consultant on computer and technology laws expresses that in the event of a competitor embedding the trademarked word into a list of keywords, every time the word is entered into a search engine, another manufacturer’s goods or website would appear which would be an obvious misuse of a trademark. According to the consultant ‘Keyword-Linked Advertising’ raises some pertinent issues:

  • A company’s trademark may be used without authorization by search engines and directories in advertising sales practices.
  • Comparative advertising practices.
  • Are visitors to websites sophisticated enough to realize they are being led by advertisements which are directly linked to the words they are searching for?
  • Are they able to differentiate between ‘use’ as defined in relation to trademarks, and merely being misled by savvy advertisers? Even if the chance of confusion is small, does that make it acceptable?
  • Are search engine owners responsible for the alleged infringement, or is the site-owner that has purchased the keyword culpable? Should portal operators be required to ‘purify’ the use of keywords and ensure that trademarks are not used in an unlawful manner?
  • How distinctive must a trademark be to have success in a case of keyword use? Can only unique, coined words be proper subject matter for protection against use as ‘keywords’?

A trademark owner mandated by trademark law if aware about a potential unauthorized use of his mark, he must seek to prevent the same.



View Other Articles

Ascent in Legal Offshoring: An Overview
August 26, 2011

Advanced possibilities for retrieving Indian patent information
June 1, 2011

Dynamism in the Offshoring sector!
June 25, 2010

Extension of Offshoring services across domains
June 11, 2010

Possible impact of rising IP Awareness
June 4, 2010

Offshoring Transcription services to India: Been there, heard that, done that!
May 28, 2010

Steering client relations ahead to gain a Competitive edge
April 29, 2010

The possible need for an industry wide alliance in the Legal Offshoring Space
April 1, 2010

Determining the factors to maximize Profits
March 25, 2010

Ensuring the Escalation of Quality
March 19, 2010

Expansion in Legal Offshoring Delivery
February 4, 2010

Focus and strategy in Offshoring
January 29, 2010

Standing of the Legal Offshoring sector
December 18, 2009

Offshoring IP Audit services
December 11, 2009

Prominence of IP Information as a Tool
December 4, 2009

Measuring the features of different Pricing Models
November 27, 2009

Offshoring Research services in the Legal Arena
November 19, 2009

Handholding Innovation while Outsourcing
November 12, 2009

Choosing the Candidates for Outsourcing
November 5, 2009

Proposed Legislations to Enhance Data Protection
October 29, 2009

Protection of IP created while Offshoring
October 15, 2009

Standing out in a Competitive Scenario
October 9, 2009

Creation of a Technology Liaison in an Outsourcing Unit
October 1, 2009

Third Party Information and Confidentiality norms
September 24, 2009

Role of a Dispute Resolution Clause in an Offshoring Contract
September 17, 2009

Adopting a Viable Pricing Model to Maximize RoI
September 10, 2009

The Role of Integration for effective delivery
September 3, 2009

Aligning Vendor Scale to Client size and Expectation
August 27, 2009

Offshoring Legal Services: Preventing Unauthorized Practice of Law
August 20, 2009

The role of training in Outsourcing
August 13, 2009

Outsourcing and RFP: Striking a Fair Deal
August 6, 2009

Value Creation: a desired outcome of Outsourcing
July 30, 2009

Looking for returns through Outsourcing: A client perspective
July 23, 2009

The importance of Project Management in Outsourcing
July 16, 2009

Scalability of Operations in Outsourcing
July 8, 2009

Advantage Outsourcing: A trend to stay
July 3, 2009

Role of Clients in Escalating Quality
June 25, 2009

Combating the risk of confidentiality and data security loss
June 18, 2009

Offshoring is Reorganization of Work
June 11, 2009

Formulating Outsourcing Contract
June 3, 2009

Implications of ABA opinion on Legal Outsourcing
May 28, 2009

Outsourcing and Document Processing
May 14, 2009

Ethical Imperatives of Conflict Checking in an LPO
May 7, 2009

Managing offshore Risks
May 1, 2009

Captives May Not Always Be What They Seem
April 23, 2009

Spotting a Trend in Outsourcing
April 16, 2009

A Brief Note on Knowledge Outsourcing
April 9, 2009

Offshore Patent Services
April 2, 2009

Economic Crisis and Outsourcing Space
March 26, 2009

Client Consent in Outsourcing Context
March 19, 2009

Offshore the Law
March 5, 2009

Forecasting a Positive Outlook for LPO Sector
February 26, 2009

Changing Nuances of Outsourcing
February 19, 2009

Litigation Work Being Outsourced to India
February 12, 2009

Keyword-Linked Advertising and Trademark Infringement
January 30, 2009

Offshoring Through The Eyes Of In-House Counsels
January 16, 2009

Compensation Rules the Roost in LPO Boom
January 8, 2009

Effective Legal Outsourcing Through Captive Centers
December 17, 2008

Growth of LPO industry in Industry
December 6, 2008

Regulation of Legal Process Outsourcing Explored
November 27, 2008

Legal Sector Poised for Innovation
November 13, 2008

Third Party Patent Marketing: A New Avenue in Knowledge Process Outsourcing
October 23, 2008

"imbibing key elements of successful solutioning model"

Request
Presentation


read more

IP Resources


view now