When a client seeks professional
legal advice and assistance from an attorney, the communications
between the client and the attorney is eligible for protection under
attorney-client privilege. Privileged communications between
attorney and client is immune from discovery by an opposing counsel
in the event of litigation. This protection enables full and frank
communication between clients and attorneys. Attorney-client
privilege affords absolute protection to privileged communications.
It is a two-way protection covering communications originating from
both the client and the attorney. Communications originating from
contract attorneys and agents (including contract attorneys, patent
agents, patent engineers and paralegals from non-US jurisdictions)
are protectable under attorney-client privilege if the contract
attorneys, patent agents, patent engineers or paralegals acted at
the direction and control of the client's attorney.
Attorney-client privilege is different "the work-product
doctrine" in the United States legal context. The "work
product doctrine" protects materials collected or prepared by
an attorney from discovery by an opposing counsel. Under the
work-product doctrine, material that is collected or prepared in
anticipation of litigation is not discoverable, unless the party
seeking discovery can demonstrate that the sought facts can only be
obtained through discovery and that those facts are indispensable
for impeaching or substantiating a claim. Work products doctrine is
broader than the attorney-client privilege. It protects materials
prepared by the attorney, whether or not disclosed to the client,
and it protects material prepared by agents for the attorney.
Accordingly, work product generated by contract attorneys, agents
(patent agents, patent engineers and paralegals) acting at the
direction and control of the client's attorney (including in-house
counsels) are non-discoverable.
Clairvolex attorneys, patent engineers and paralegals typically act
at the direction and control of attorneys at law or patent attorneys
of the instructing law firms or the companies. In both instances of
Clairvolex servicing a Law Firm in the United States or a Company,
the work products are generated at the direction and control of the
attorney (in-house or the associates or partners of the law firm).
Therefore, the Clairvolex work products are non-discoverable by an
opposing counsel in the event of litigation. The position remains
the same even if the billing arrangement is directly between the
instructing US attorneys and Clairvolex.
The communications between Clairvolex attorneys, patent engineers
and paralegals and the instructing attorneys come under
attorney-client privilege as the Clairvolex attorneys, patent
engineers and paralegals act as contracting attorneys or agents for
the common client. Thus the communications between Clairvolex
attorneys, patent engineers and paralegals and the instructing US
attorneys are non-discoverable in the event of litigation involving
the same.
In order to doubly ensure that the communications and work products
generated by Clairvolex attorneys, patent engineers and paralegals
are privileged and non-discoverable, we ensure that the generation
of all legal work products (As for example opinion on patentability
or patent infringement) are constantly monitored by the attorneys at
the associate law firm.




